Archive for January, 2010

Personal Assessment

Monday, January 25th, 2010

Have I exhausted all of the reasonable, productive alternatives for determining the total amount of our assets and income?  Have I done my research thoroughly, so that I have a valid understanding of our financial situation. If I do a thorough job of investigation and reviewing the available information, I will feel confident to choose a settlement offer that is acceptable.  Taking responsibility for my own protection through educating myself is a positive step toward my future financial independence.

Have I exhausted all available mediation and settlement opportunities?  I am confident that I can protect my own financial and economic well-being through my ability to evaluate settlement opportunities carefully, even when my feelings are hurt or I long for revenge.

Have I acknowledged my share of what went wrong in the marriage, even if I feel it’s mostly my spouse’s actions which have caused us to divorce?  Being able to recognize that each of us has contributed to the situation will help me to have a balanced perspective for settlement.

Have I made the right choices for myself in terms of advisors, goals toward economic self-sufficiency, and emotional independence?  Resolving these issues and learning to separate before the divorce is finalized will help me negotiate a fair resolution based on facts, not feelings.

Have I honestly evaluated whether the proposals which have been made are reasonable?  If I do not believe them to be reasonable, do they provide for me sufficiently so that I am able to accomplish most of my goals?  Learning to accept a settlement which is imperfect may be the best way to resolve my divorce in the long run, even if it is disappointing in the short term. For more information, see our resource center at http://www.peace-talks.com/resources.php. Online support is available at http://www.divorce360.com/.

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

Effecting a Settlement

Tuesday, January 19th, 2010

As you are headed for trial, take a final breath and ask yourself whether you have done all you can to avoid the continuation of conflict. By now, if you are still disputing a settlement, you have probably decided that it is really your spouse who does not want to settle, and he/she is doing everything possible to prevent your getting your fair share. True or not, you still have the power to end the dispute. One can always turn the other cheek in a fight. Even in war, it takes two to tango. The 60′s slogan is apropos here: What if they had a war and nobody came?

Taking stock of your situation one final time, and determining whether settlement is possible, evaluate…

  • Am I still consumed with hurt and rage that I wish to visit on my ex-spouse?
  • Do I still want him or her to come to his senses and call the whole thing off?
  • Have I acknowledged my share of what went wrong in the marriage, even if my spouse had the affair or became the alcoholic? What did I do, or what did I overlook?
  • Am I ready to become more self-sufficient economically? If I have small children, do I have a reasonable plan for how I can be with them as much as I need to and participate in the family money making as soon as I am able?
  • Do I have a lawyer who advises me to make compromises, to keep my family interests at the center of the divorce, and to settle issues whenever possible? Or do I have a lawyer who encourages me openly or indirectly to fight?
  • Do I need to keep fighting or do I and my children have the basis for a healthy post-divorce life? Maybe my ex-spouse will see the children more than I want him to, but will that really harm my child, or will it be an irritation he or she will have to stand up to when at an appropriate age to do so?
  • Am I acting out of fear of the unknown; are my fears rational or irrational?
  • Have I worked out ways of separating from my spouse physically and psychologically? Do we have plans that limit contact to the extent I feel comfortable; could limiting contact further help us reach settlement?
  • If we’re stuck on economic issues, is there another way to look at the issue? Could we make an interim agreement that has a definite endpoint that will give us both time to adjust? Maybe it is less fair for one of us for 5 years, and then tips the other way. Maybe our negotiations leave things too open-ended for too long.
  • Are we communicating in a way that serves the divorce rather than conflict? Am I badgering him? Is she provoking me? Could we get help communicating rather than negotiating?
  • Am I still focused on the past? What could I do to look more happily toward the future? How will the settlement proposals support my goals for the future?
  • Do I have proposals on the table that I can live with? Are they really impossible or are they unfair? If unfair, how much fairer would they need to be before I can live with them?

After answering these questions, you will have a sense of whether you are ready to settle or in what areas you need to do more work. Your inability to find an acceptable settlement could be personal, or it could be between partners, or it might require more assurances where your children are concerned. In this imperfect world, weigh the value of stretching out the divorce versus living with this amount of imperfection. If you are satisfied that you have not settled your divorce for solid reasons — that you or your child’s safety, mental health, or economic stability are at issue — then you need to switch into the mind set of preparing for trial.

For a terrific video describing the Seven Keys to Resolving Family Conflict, see http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xYBx–zUtlo. For additional tips on how to diffuse an argument before it gets out of hand see http://singleparents.about.com/od/successfulcoparenting/ tp/stop_arguing_with_your_ex.htm.

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Uncategorized | No Comments »

When You Can’t Avoid a Trial

Friday, January 15th, 2010

If you know your settlement priorities, and you simply can’t abide by the most recent negotiations and offers that are on the table, then a trial is your remaining option. Inappropriate or non-existent settlement offers are legitimate reasons to try your case. However, needing to tell your story, or seeking justice, or revenge on your spouse by venting every perceived misdeed perpetrated by him or her during your marriage are not legitimate reasons.

Sometimes clients and lawyers are not on the same wavelength concerning what will be important at a trial. While the client may be feeling a great deal of stress, grief, loss and anger over the situation, the lawyer views this essentially as a business deal. The lawyer needs to view it that way — that’s why you are paying him/her: for expertise, experience, and objectivity.

While for the divorcing parties a trial is both an economic and psychological decision, understand that judges are mostly concerned with providing a reasonably fair allocation of income and assets based on the laws of your state. They are not concerned with unraveling every transaction between you and your spouse. Fault issues like endless arguments and hurtful words may be at the forefront of your mind, but will seem minor to the judge. Don’t make the decision to try your case on moral grounds alone. This is essentially a business transaction, even if it doesn’t feel that way, and you need to decide how you can finalize your case in the least expensive way possible. Don’t let your emotions get in the way of a good, solid business decision.  

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

Posted in Cost of Divorce, Divorce Preparation, Going to Trial, Uncategorized | No Comments »

When and Why Should I Go to Trial?

Monday, January 11th, 2010

Before you even think of preparing for a trial make sure that you have exhausted all mediation and settlement negotiation possibilities. There are two costs in a trial: economic and psychological.

 

The economics of a trial are clear. Unless you are fighting about more than $15,000, a trial could not possibly make any economic sense whatsoever. It makes more sense for you and your spouse to keep the money in your family, even if that means paying more money to your spouse than you’d like to pay, rather than to pay more money to the lawyers to prepare for and hold a trial. The amount of trial preparation that goes into a case is enormous, even for the smallest trial. Trials don’t create money, and they don’t give you more hours in a day to spend with your children. The fees you’ll spend for your lawyer, your spouse’s lawyer, expert witness fees, psychologists, and anyone else who has to be paid as part of the process comes out of your joint pocketbook. Although a judge may allocate the fees to one or the other to pay, that still leaves less total money to divide up.

 

To make the fee situation even more expensive than it already is, a lawyer doesn’t want to take a chance of ruining someone’s life by doing a poor job in a trial. Your lawyer will want to make sure you have the best representation possible, for the best chance possible at a favorable outcome. As a result, your lawyer will probably over-prepare. This preparation could end up costing you a small fortune. In the end, you may not feel it was worth it, especially if you settle the case just hours before the trial is scheduled to start.

 

In psychological terms, it is never worthwhile to go to trial except in the most exigent circumstances. The amount of emotional damage which occurs between two spouses during a trial is immeasurable. Imagine how you will feel after you have said every unfavorable thing you can think of about your spouse, and he or she has said every unfavorable thing that he or she can think of about you. And he or she has probably exaggerated, misinterpreted, or made some things up (at least in your opinion!) about you. Now imagine sitting next to this person at your child’s wedding. Imagine running into him or her at the grocery store. Imagine trying to call a former mutual friend. It won’t be easy to live in the same community after a trial, and it will be even harder to effectively co-parent your children. When you’re thinking about whether to take your case to trial, don’t just count the dollars and cents. You need to consider the emotional aspects as well.

 

Before you proceed to a trial, make sure that what you are fighting over will matter five years from now. If it will not, then find a way to settle.

Take this time to make sure you have done your research. See http://www.peace-talks.com/divorceinformation.php. Also be sure to visit the Peace Talks resource center at http://www.peace-talks.com/resources.php

 

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

 

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , ,
Posted in Going to Trial | No Comments »

How to Use the Pretrial Process

Monday, January 4th, 2010

If you do not settle at the court ordered settlement conference, you “advance” to the pretrial stage. During the pre-trial process, discuss the pros and cons of all possible outcomes with your lawyer. Your lawyer should be able to give you a worst possible and best possible scenario, and a range of expected outcomes in-between the two extremes. Your lawyer should also be able to tell you where any particular offer on the table falls in this continuum. Understand that your lawyer doesn’t know for certain what would happen at a trial, but any experienced lawyer can give you a decent guess. Once in a while a case will have a factual scenario that is so unusual that it is impossible to predict a range of outcomes.

 

Sometimes you will have the unhappy choice of the settlement offer being unacceptably low for you to take, but it simply is not worth the economic or emotional toll to go to trial. This will take some tough thinking on your part to determine whether or not you wish to proceed with a trial. While the settlement may not be fair, it may be better than what even a more favorable outcome would be for you after a trial. You need to consider all of the costs: emotional, financial, and legal, before you decide to turn down a settlement offer.

 

For example, suppose your lawyer thinks that you should receive at least $20,000 from the settlement on the house. The offer on the table is $15,000, but your lawyer estimates that it will cost you $7,000 to try the case, and that if you try the case you should end up with between $17,000 and $25,000. In this scenario it may not make sense to make the additional $7,000 investment, because you would have to come out with more than $22,000 in order to “break even” with the offer that’s on the table. It therefore makes sense to take an offer that seems unfair, but which is ultimately more cost effective.

 

Sometimes when a scenario like this happens the lawyer is seen as representing the compromise rather than the client. This is always a tough situation for a client and for an attorney. It’s easy for the attorney to see the dollars and cents aspect of the case, but the client may be feeling that the lawyer should be advocating for what’s best for the client. Yet the lawyer is advocating that the client take a settlement that both the lawyer and the client agree is unfair. If you truly don’t think that your lawyer is looking out for your best interests, you need to fire your lawyer and get a different lawyer. If your lawyer feels that you are in a situation that has become a choice between two unfavorable options, your lawyer should be straightforward with you about that.

For a host of free divorce information, see http://www.peace-talks.com/divorceinformation.php. Also be sure to visit the Peace Talks resource center at http://www.peace-talks.com/resources.php.

 

 

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

 

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

 

  • Share/Bookmark

Tags: , ,
Posted in Going to Trial | 1 Comment »

Bad Behavior has blocked 790 access attempts in the last 7 days.