Archive for August, 2009

Personal Property in all Jurisdictions

Thursday, August 27th, 2009

The courts are reluctant to get involved in dividing up personal property, so if you and your spouse can do it yourselves, that is the best way to proceed. By the time you’ve argued in court about a two year old TV set and a sofa with a spot on it, you will have spent enough in lawyers’ fees to purchase both items new. Sit down with the list of your personal property and sort out the obvious items that one spouse or the other will want. The antique that came from your mother’s family home should go back to you, and his favorite recliner should go to him. Narrow your list to those items which are actually in dispute.

 

Once you have determined which items are in dispute, make a list of them. From here, there are several ways to proceed. One frequently used method  is to flip a coin, and the winner gets to pick the first item, the loser gets to pick the second item, the winner gets to pick the third item, and so forth.

 

Another possibility is to assign a dollar value to the property and have an “auction”. The spouse who wants certain pieces of property the most will be willing to pay the other spouse more for them than the spouse to whom the property is less important.

 

The Court will be reluctant to award one spouse money in exchange for giving the other spouse most of the personal property. Despite your sentimental attachment to your furniture and personal items, unless they are antiques, oriental rugs, or paintings by famous artists, most of your items have more value to you personally than they would to someone else. A judge will be unlikely to place values on the items, and award one spouse or the other the commensurate cash value for the items.

 

The message is to negotiate with your spouse for any personal property that you want, and don’t expect to be paid for what you give up. Take what you feel you deserve, but don’t expect any cash in lieu of property given up unless you both agree. For a good article on dividing property without a fight, see http://www.divorcehelp.com/rr/rr09.html.

 

If you cannot agree upon a fair way to divide up the items in dispute, at least you have narrowed the list, hopefully to a manageable length, for your lawyer to deal with in negotiations, or for the judge to divide at the time of the trial. For more tips on divvying up everything from family silver to DVDs, see  http://www.firstwivesworld.com/resources/resource-articles/divvying-everything-family-silver-dvds-during-divorce.

 

Emotions run high for certain possessions, and spouses sometimes use these hot buttons as an opportunity to retaliate against the other person. A good benchmark is “will this matter in 5 years?” If it will not matter, then be prepared to give it up now.

 

 

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

 

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

Yours Alone or Community Property

Tuesday, August 25th, 2009

If a business increased in value because the businessperson devoted time, skill, and expertise, then the business will be considered community property. Examples include an interior decorating business, software development, and other labor-intensive businesses.

Professional licenses are not subject to division, but can warrant alimony orders to even-out the earning power of the spouses.

 

To the extent that you intend to prove that an asset is your separate property, or that although an asset was purchased while you were married it was purchased with separate property, be prepared to present documentation which traces the source of the funds used to acquire the asset. If you have kept your property separate, you have a good chance of it remaining separate property for purposes of a community property state divorce. If you’ve intermingled separate property with community property, the court may find that you intended to give a gift of that separate property to your spouse, or that, at best, you’re entitled to reimbursement (without interest) for your separate property’s contribution to community property.

 

For instance, if you owned a rental property prior to your marriage and kept the rental income separate from any marital funds, in a bank account in your sole name, and used only the rental income to improve the rental property, then the rental income will be considered to have remained separate property, even though it accumulated during your marriage.

 

While the details of property division can become a bit confusing, keep sight of the initial premise: if it accumulated during your marriage, it’s probably community property. If you intend to claim otherwise, be prepared to prove it.

 

If property accumulated during your marriage, it’s probably community property and will be divided 50/50. If you intend to claim otherwise, be prepared to prove it. If you have questions, you may choose to meet with a divorce financial planner. See https://www.institutedfa.com/ReferralSearchPage.aspx. For resource on the financial aspects of divorce, see http://www.peace-talks.com/finformation.php.

 

 

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

 

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

Community Property States

Friday, August 21st, 2009

The remaining nine states are Community Property states: Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin. This means that, with a few exceptions, only property which was accumulated during the marriage will be divided, and that property will be divided 50/50, asset by asset, whenever possible. Wages, income and bonuses are community property, as is credit obtained during the marriage. Therefore, homemakers are not penalized by not working outside the home, and claims of “I earned all of the money, so all of the property is mine!” aren’t considered by the court. Property which accumulated to either of you prior to the marriage, or during the marriage through a gift or inheritance, or by virtue of appreciation or rents from other pre-marital property is considered “separate property” and is not subject to division by the court (again, with some exceptions).

In Community Property states, the main exceptions are:

 

  1. when one spouse receives a community property-funded education, the community property used to fund that education will be reimbursed for the educational expenses, unless both spouses received a community property funded-education, more than 10 years has passed since the education was completed, or the marital community has benefitted in some other way. Any educational loans taken out for educational expenses are the responsibility of the person who received the education.
  2. when liabilities exceed assets.
  3. when one spouse has misappropriated family assets. Oddly enough, this does not include excessive gambling debts, as all debts incurred during the marriage are considered marital debts, irrespective of whether one spouse had the permission of the other spouse to incur the debt.
  4. lawsuit liabilities for injuries. For lawsuit liabilities, who has to pay depends on whether the accident happened in the course of “marital business”. For example, if you are involved in an accident while driving to the store to buy groceries, then the liability is paid from community assets. If you get in an accident while on your way to meet a friend for a social outing, the liability is paid from your separate property.

 

For people with children and a family home, the family home may be awarded to the custodial spouse, and the other spouse may receive other assets to compensate for giving up an interest in the home.

 

Businesses started prior to the marriage present a special problem. The division depends upon whether any increase in the business value is due to the nature of the business, or the businessperson’s special efforts. If the business has increased in value because of the nature of the business, then the business is generally separate property. The leading case in this area of law is VanCamp, pertaining to the divorce of the VanCamps of pork & beans fame. Their business value increased drastically during World War II just because of the nature of the business, i.e., canned food during wartime. Such a business was maintained as separate property.

 

For a host of free divorce information, see http://www.peace-talks.com/resources.php. A list of other resources is available at http://www.peace-talks.com/divorceinformation.php.

 

 

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

 

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

Distributing Property in an Equitable Division State

Tuesday, August 18th, 2009

If you had substantial property prior to your marriage, or you inherited substantial property during the marriage, you may be able to preserve this property as your own, separate property even in an equitable jurisdiction state. Be prepared to prove ownership and how you acquired the property, and be sure to give this information to your attorney early in your case.

 

The following is a checklist of facts and factors for distributing property in an equitable division state:

 

  1. age
  2. health
  3. education
  4. ability to earn income in the future
  5. ability to accumulate assets in the future
  6. special needs of children
  7. parenting needs of children
  8. contribution to assets
  9. separate property
  10. inheritances, gifts, and family loans
  11. appreciation of joint and sole assets over time
  12. liquidity of funds
  13. tax ramifications
  14. pre-marital contributions
  15. non-monetary contributions

 

The better prepared you are, the more likely you are to feel that your settlement is fair. For a list off good books on the divorce process, see http://www.peace-talks.com/books.php. Also, be sure to see the Peace Talks resource center at  http://www.peace-talks.com/resources.php.

 

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

 

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

Other Factors Influencing Property Division

Wednesday, August 12th, 2009

Other factors that can influence property division are how long you have been married, how old each of you are, what your health is like, what your educational backgrounds are, your prospects for future income, whether or not the judge thinks that the spouse ordered to pay child support and spousal maintenance will actually pay the orders, and a variety of other factors. Inheritances and money that each spouse contributed to the marriage are often important as well. Be sure to bring these matters up with your lawyer and discuss what they mean in your particular case, given your state’s laws. While each case is decided individually by the court, your lawyer can give you an idea of how judges in your state would consider each factor, and how that would translate into property distribution in your case.

 

Courts recognize non-monetary contributions to families just as they do monetary contributions. Housewives, stay-at-home moms, stay-at-home dads, and spouses who contributed to the family in non-monetary ways are recognized along with spouses who contributed to the home with salary, inheritance, or savings.

 

Don’t expect the court to do a dollar-for-dollar accounting of all money earned and spent by each spouse.

 

Most courts will assume that while you and your spouse were married, you made certain decisions together in the best interests of your family as a whole. The Court will not second guess those decisions by punishing one spouse for not working, or for not earning as much, unless those are material issues in your case. For example, if the reason your spouse didn’t work is because he or she had a drug problem, the Court will likely consider that unfavorably toward your spouse in the property settlement. If your spouse didn’t work because he or she stayed home with the children while you advanced your career, the Court will view that spouse as an equal contributor to your family assets, even though his or her contribution was not monetary. It is not the Court’s purpose to unravel every financial transaction during your entire marriage to decide who contributed exactly how much money, who purchased which item of furniture, and who worked the most hours, thereby creating a disparity in earnings. It may be helpful for you to work with a divorce financial planner. To find one near you, see https://www.institutedfa.com/ReferralSearchPage.aspx. See the financial section on the Peace Talks website at http://www.peace-talks.com/finformation.php.

 

 

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

 

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

Property: Equitable Division of States

Monday, August 10th, 2009

Forty-one of the fifty states are Equitable Division states (i.e., every state except Arizona, California, Idaho, Louisiana, Nevada, New Mexico, Texas, Washington, and Wisconsin). That means that the court has the ability to order that any property belonging to either you or your spouse may be subject to division by the court. The division is based on what the court determines to be fair, hence the name “equitable division.” All  property acquired during the marriage is subject to division, as well as property which was acquired prior to the marriage by either of you individually, gifts from one family, inheritances, personal injury lawsuit settlements, bonuses, pensions, stock options and other assets which you have value to you.

 

Typically, most courts will focus on dividing the assets which accumulated during the marriage rather than those which accumulated prior to it. Pre-marital assets may be subject to division, however, depending upon the individual circumstances of your case.

 

For example, if you and your spouse have $150,000 in assets which accumulated during the marriage, both of you are in good health and have decent jobs, and your children are healthy and don’t require any special care, then the court will focus first on dividing those assets. Assets which each of you accumulated prior to the marriage will be considered, but if dividing the marital assets will provide each of you with a reasonable settlement, then several thousand dollars of pre-marital savings or property is probably “safe” from the court’s orders.

 

If, on the other hand, one of you has $100,000 in premarital savings, and together the two of you accumulated no assets, but $20,000 in credit card debt, it is likely that a court will order a portion of that $100,000 to go to the other spouse, and to pay the credit card debts. For information about finances and divorce, see http://www.peace-talks.com/finformation.php. You may also find it helpful to work with a divorce financial analyst, see https://www.institutedfa.com/ReferralSearchPage.aspx.

  

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

 

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

More Alimony Considerations

Friday, August 7th, 2009

Someone in the 28% federal tax bracket, every $100 in alimony paid “costs” only $72 because of the tax savings. If the recipient is in the 15% tax bracket, each $100 received means only $85 is truly realized because of the taxes owed. As you can see, there’s a gap of $13 which is the IRS’s way of helping divorcing couples make ends meet. By utilizing alimony effectively, the couple saves $13 in taxes for every $100. Many state tax laws also provide for alimony deductions on top of the federal deductions. If your and your spouse’s incomes are unequal alimony may help you both save money, so explore the tax ramifications of an alimony order, both individually and as a couple. Alimony can help keep money in your collective pockets rather than in the hands of the IRS. As much as spouses dislike giving alimony to each other, giving it to the IRS is even less popular!

 

If you have children, and paying alimony in addition to child support is a possibility, the IRS has another vehicle by which you may take advantage of tax provisions called “Unallocated Alimony and Support,” which is a special combination of alimony and child support — all of which is deductible by the paying spouse and taxable as income to the receiving spouse. If your incomes are very disparate; for example, if one of you stays home with the children and does not earn an income, then this option may make most sense for you.

 

Courts have also modernized alimony in creating “rehabilitative alimony” or limited term alimony. Rather than have alimony continue for the rest of one’s life, as was typical 20 years ago, courts nowadays are considering orders which last for a specific period of time and then terminate. For example, in the case of a woman who has taken time off from her career as a teacher to raise 2 children, now ages 3 and 5, the court might award alimony for four years. During that 4 year time period, the woman has an opportunity to renew her teaching license, look for a job, and establish the children in school. By the time the 4 years pass, she should be in a much better position to support herself, without further need for alimony. Without a reasonable reprieve (in this example, 4 years), she may be unable to find a job immediately because her teaching license or education is out of date, she might be unable to find reasonably priced daycare for the children, and the children would be forced to adapt to a sudden change of living circumstances. Even a few years of modest alimony helps this situation immensely.

 

On the other hand, there are also traditional cases in which women who have made their lives as housewives find themselves 30 years later without a pension, 401K, or even a job. Many of these women married in college, or before college, and never finished their education. Some have never worked outside of the home, and find themselves for the first time without financial support. Because of their family work and skills, their husbands were able to further their careers without having to worry about keeping house or daily arrangements for the children. At age 55, finding a first job is extremely difficult. Alimony in this type of a scenario is more likely to be ordered for an indefinite period. For some terrific resources on divorce and money, see http://financialplan.about.com/od/divorceandmoney/Divorce_and_Money.htm. Also see the Peace Talks website’s financial information at  http://www.peace-talks.com/finformation.php.

 

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

 

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

A Few Other Considerations for Alimony

Tuesday, August 4th, 2009

For most divorcing spouses in states which recognize alimony awards, alimony is a hot emotional issue. In a typical scenario, the husband pays the wife alimony. The longer the marriage, the more likely alimony will be awarded. For the husband, it is difficult to stomach paying alimony when you feel that you earned most of the money anyway. While you may feel that she never did much to help you at the office or with the children, she feels that she was your “right arm”. As the wife, you may feel that you deserve all that he is worth and could be worth someday, since you supported the family during his education, early career, or even while he amassed his profits. You feel he couldn’t have reached his current status without you, while he insists that you undermined him at every turn and did precious little to further his achievements.

 

Anyone who is required to pay alimony after his or her spouse decided unilaterally that he/she wanted a divorce tends to feel doubly hurt by the system. It is painful to pay someone a substantial part of your income while you are in the throes of divorce and related conflicts, and you’d prefer to spend your money on your children, new partner, or yourself. Almost all partners feel that they are the generous spouse, and their partner is being unreasonable during the divorce process. Therefore, the subject of alimony adds salt in wounds that are already searing. It helps to remember during this time that alimony is a potentially versatile and cost-effective way to help settle your case. Often clients say, “I don’t want to pay a dime of alimony!” only to realize later that the “dime of alimony” is actually the cheapest, most sensible alternative. It is one method of equalizing assets over time; it is not the only way, and if it can be thought about calmly and with creativity it can be a useful tool for a successful divorce. For more divorce financial information, see http://www.peace-talks.com/finformation.php.

 

For example, many people do not realize is that, for tax purposes, alimony is deductible for the person who pays the alimony, and included in income for the person who receives alimony. You must consider the tax ramifications of an alimony order before deciding whether it makes sense for you. An alimony order can save a couple a great deal of money. In other cases, what you hope to gain, given the tax ramifications, is not worth the fight to get it. For some terrific information on divorce financial planning, see  

http://www.divorcesource.com/info/financialplanning/financialplanning.shtml.

 

 

Excerpted from Your Divorce Advisor: A Lawyer and a Psychologist Guide You Through the Legal and Emotional Landscape of Divorce (Simon & Schuster/Fireside 2001). For more information: http://www.yourdivorceadvisor.com/.

 

For more information contact Peace Talks www.peace-talks.com 

(C) 2008  Peace Talks Mediation Services, Inc.

  • Share/Bookmark

Bad Behavior has blocked 789 access attempts in the last 7 days.